Protecting What Matters Most
by James Evans - April 29th, 2026
Determining a parenting time arrangement requires careful judgment, particularly when emotions are heightened and established routines must be adjusted. In Texas, courts rely on a clearly defined legal framework to promote consistency, and the standard possession order in Texas often serves as the foundation for many custody arrangements. Families in Austin benefit from structured plans that are practical, predictable, and designed to preserve meaningful involvement from both parents while minimizing unnecessary conflict.
At Evans Family Law Group, we approach these matters with thoughtful preparation, clear communication, and a disciplined focus on solutions that are both enforceable and aligned with the child’s best interests.
A possession order establishes the specific periods during which each parent will have access to and spend time with their child following a separation or divorce. Texas courts structure these orders to prioritize the child’s best interests, emphasizing stability, continuity, and the preservation of strong parent-child relationships.
The Standard Possession Order, commonly referred to as an SPO, represents the default schedule applied in most custody matters. A standard possession order typically follows a structured schedule that includes first, third, and fifth weekends, alternating holidays, and extended summer periods, ensuring children maintain consistent contact with both parents. This framework is intended to provide predictability while supporting each parent’s continued involvement.
According to the Texas Family Code Section 153.252, courts presume that a standard possession schedule is in the child’s best interest unless evidence demonstrates otherwise.
When parents live within 100 miles of each other, the schedule is structured to allow consistent, frequent interaction throughout the year. Key components typically include:
This structure promotes regular contact while maintaining a stable routine for the child.
Distance significantly affects how parenting time is allocated. When parents live more than 100 miles apart, courts adjust the schedule to account for travel considerations. Rather than frequent shorter visits, the noncustodial parent is typically granted longer, less frequent periods of possession, particularly during school breaks and summer months.
The 100-mile rule is applied when the possession order is established, determining the schedule based on the parents’ geographic distance. This differs from relocation considerations that may arise later, as this standard is used to form the initial order rather than modify an existing one.
Courts may depart from the standard schedule when it does not adequately reflect the child’s specific needs or the parents’ circumstances. A modified possession order allows for a tailored approach that accounts for factors such as work obligations, school schedules, or other practical considerations affecting daily life.
In practice, courts often consider whether a customized arrangement will better support consistency and reduce conflict. The objective remains the same: to establish a schedule that is workable, sustainable, and focused on the child’s well-being.
In circumstances where concerns exist regarding a child’s safety or welfare, courts may require supervised possession. Under this arrangement, parenting time occurs in the presence of an approved third party or at a designated facility, ensuring that contact takes place in a controlled, secure environment.
For children under three, courts frequently impose more individualized schedules. These arrangements typically involve shorter, more frequent periods of possession to support early bonding while accounting for the child’s developmental needs and routines.
An Expanded Standard Possession Order builds upon the traditional framework by increasing the amount of time the noncustodial parent spends with the child. This often includes extended weekend periods that begin when school is dismissed and conclude when school resumes, thereby increasing overnight time.
The primary distinction between a standard and expanded possession schedule lies in the allocation of time. While both follow a structured format, the expanded version provides longer periods of possession and additional overnight stays. Courts may approve this arrangement when it aligns with the child’s best interests and the parents demonstrate an ability to maintain consistency.
Relocation frequently raises questions regarding its effect on an existing possession order. It is important to distinguish these circumstances from the 100-mile rule applied when establishing the original schedule.
The 50-mile rule applies after a possession order is already in place. When a parent seeks to relocate, courts evaluate whether the proposed move materially affects the existing schedule and whether adjustments are necessary to preserve meaningful contact between the child and both parents.
When a parent relocates more than 50 miles from their prior residence, the court may review and modify the existing possession order. Adjustments may include extended visitation periods, revised holiday allocations, or alternative arrangements designed to account for increased travel distance.
This distinction is critical. The 100-mile rule governs how a possession schedule is initially structured, while the 50-mile rule addresses changes that occur after the order has been established.
Obtaining a possession order begins with filing a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. In Austin and the surrounding areas, courts encourage mediation when possible.
Early in the process, a court may enter temporary orders establishing an interim parenting schedule pending the case. These arrangements can influence the final order when they reflect what is workable and in the child’s best interests.
If an agreement cannot be reached, the court will determine an appropriate schedule based on the child’s best interests after reviewing evidence. This may involve hearings. The court may consider factors such as the child’s age, educational needs, each parent’s availability, and the distance between residences, including whether a requested arrangement differs from a typical standard possession order in the Texas framework.
Careful preparation remains important. Well-supported proposals help the court understand how a requested schedule promotes stability, minimizes disruption, and preserves the child’s relationship with both parents. Courts aim to establish orders that are practical, stable, and sustainable over time.
Although parenting time and financial support are related, they serve distinct purposes. A possession order governs when each parent spends time with the child, while child support ensures that the child’s financial needs are consistently met.
Under Texas Family Code Section 153.312, standard possession schedules provide a framework for determining parenting time, which may also inform how courts evaluate related support obligations.
In most cases, the parent with less possession time is responsible for paying child support. However, support is not determined solely by parenting time. Courts also evaluate income, the number of children involved, and other relevant statutory factors to ensure that the child’s needs are adequately provided for.
Addressing a custody matter requires careful planning and a clear understanding of how Texas law applies to your circumstances. At Evans Family Law Group, we work with families to develop structured, forward-thinking solutions that protect your parental role while prioritizing your child’s well-being.
Call (512) 628-2550 to move forward with clarity, confidence, and a plan tailored to your family’s needs.
Our Austin family law attorneys handle a wide range of matters, including divorce, child custody, child support, spousal support (alimony), property division, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, adoption, and modifications of court orders. Whether your case is straightforward or highly contested, our team provides personalized legal guidance to protect your rights and your family’s future.
The timeline for a divorce varies depending on the complexity of the case and whether it’s contested or uncontested. Texas law requires a 60-day waiting period after filing before a divorce can be finalized, but contested cases involving disputes over property, custody, or support can take several months or even longer to resolve.
An uncontested divorce occurs when both spouses agree on all major issues, such as property division, custody, and support. These cases are generally faster and less expensive.
A contested divorce, on the other hand, involves disagreements that require negotiation, mediation, or a court decision. Our attorneys are experienced in both types of cases and can guide you through either process efficiently.
In Texas, the court’s primary concern is always the best interest of the child. Factors considered include each parent’s ability to provide for the child, the stability of each home environment, the child’s relationship with each parent, and, in some cases, the child’s preferences. Our Austin family lawyers work hard to protect your parental rights and achieve an arrangement that supports your child’s well-being.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by Attorney James Evans, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a family law attorney.
When you are in the situation that requires the help of a family lawyer, your future and possibly the futur...
If your divorce or child custody case involves two financially and emotionally stable parents making orderl...
Not surprisingly, dads are more likely to be the parent seeking advice on how to obtain primary custody of ...
Our Austin divorce lawyers are committed to helping you find effective solutions that protect your interests and provide peace of mind during this pivotal time.
Agreed Divorce can help you move forward with dignity, grace, and respect. Evans Family Law Group helps Austin-area families.
Facing a child custody dispute in Austin can be an overwhelming and emotional experience, filled with legal intricacies and important decisions that impact your family’s future.
Whether establishing child support for the first time, modifying a previous order, or attempting to enforce an order of child support – this issue can turn even the simplest cases into a bitter point of dispute between parents.
Dealing with a high-conflict divorce in Austin? Finding the right lawyer can help protect your interests, handle complex legal issues, and reach a fair resolution.
Prenuptial agreements are not just about dividing assets; they’re about starting a marriage right. Discussions about financial matters early lowers the stress related to monetary issues.
Generally, there is a presumption that parents should be named joint managing conservators of their child unless it would not be in the child’s best interest or there is a history or pattern of family violence.
At Evans Family Law Group, we combine our in-depth knowledge, strategic approach, and commitment to you to achieve optimal results.
Effective in and out of the courtroom with 17 years in practice and over 100 jury trials to our credit.